Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206217›Full record

ArticleAddiction & health2019

The Experiences of People Who Quit Khat and the Health Care Professionals Who Support them.

Suhana Begum, Angeliki Bogosian, Hayley McBain

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction & health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suhana BegumSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Health Services Research and Management, University of London, London, England.
Angeliki BogosianSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Health Services Research and Management, University of London, London, England.
Hayley McBainSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Health Services Research and Management, University of London, London, England.
Department of Health Services · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to explore the barriers and enablers to quitting khat from the perspective of users and the barriers and enablers to supporting users to quit from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs).

methodsThe present qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to collect and analyse data.

findingsOverall, 10 khat users and 3 professionals were interviewed. Beliefs about the consequences of continued use facilitated user's decisions to quit. Social influences were both a barrier and an enabler. For professionals, the social influence of other colleagues and working together was key in enabling them to support clients. Social/professional role and identity was also an important enabler, as professionals saw supporting users to quit as an integral part of their role. A range of behaviour change techniques was identified as potential ways in which quitting attempts could be more successful, from the perspective of users and professionals.

conclusionThe study reveals the complexity of khat chewing and quitting from the perspective of khat users, such as the varied influence of family and friends. It also identifies the many barriers and enablers that professionals experience when supporting individuals to quit, such as working with other professionals. There is little evidence for the effectiveness of current services provided for quitting khat or little information outlining how they were developed. Current services would benefit from evaluating the effectiveness of the interventions using established methodology. Recommendations have been provided for practice in the field of substance misuse.

Indexed as

CathaDrug usersQuitSubstance withdrawal syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32206217
PMCPMC7073807
OpenAlexW2997626935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.