Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206114›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2020

Synthetic immunity by remote control.

Lena Gamboa, Ali H Zamat, Gabriel A Kwong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In vivo gene delivery to immune cells.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Magnetic systems for cancer immunotherapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Heat Shock Proteins in Lymphoma Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lena GamboaThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Ali H ZamatThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Gabriel A KwongThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Noninvasive and predictive biomarkers of organ transplant rejectionDP2HD091793 · NICHD · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KWONG, GABRIEL A · 2016 to 2016
$2.4M
Graduate Training for Rationally Designed, Integrative Biomaterials - GT BioMATT32EB006343 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TEMENOFF, JOHNNA S · 2008 to 2018
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006343NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD091793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based immunotherapies, such as T cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), have the potential to cure patients of disease otherwise refractory to conventional treatments. Early-on-treatment and long-term durability of patient responses depend critically on the ability to control the potency of adoptively transferred T cells, as overactivation can lead to complications like cytokine release syndrome, and immunosuppression can result in ineffective responses to therapy. Drugs or biologics (e.g., cytokines) that modulate immune activity are limited by mass transport barriers that reduce the local effective drug concentration, and lack site or target cell specificity that results in toxicity. Emerging technologies that enable site-targeted, remote control of key T cell functions - including proliferation, antigen-sensing, and target-cell killing - have the potential to increase treatment precision and safety profile. These technologies are broadly applicable to other immune cells to expand immune cell therapies across many cancers and diseases. In this review, we highlight the opportunities, challenges and the current state-of-the-art for remote control of synthetic immunity.

Indexed as

CytokinesHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenSynthetic BiologyCytokinesReceptors, Chimeric Antigenengineered cellsgene switchesimmunotherapyremote controlsynthetic immunity

Identifiers

PMID32206114
PMCPMC7069089
OpenAlexW3006929601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.