Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206013›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2020

Exploring User-Related Drivers of the Early Acceptance of Certified Digital Stress Prevention Programs in Germany.

Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen, Severin Hennemann, Christina Kück, Alexandra Wodner, Dorota Geibel, Marlies Riebschläger, Martin Zeißler, Bernhard Breil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Apolinário-HagenInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-9225
Severin HennemannDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Experimental Psychopathology, Institute of Psychology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christina KückFaculty of Psychology, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Alexandra WodnerFaculty of Psychology, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Dorota GeibelFaculty of Psychology, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Marlies RiebschlägerFaculty of Psychology, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Martin ZeißlerFaculty of Psychology, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Bernhard BreilFaculty of Health Care, Hochschule Niederrhein, University of Applied Sciences, Krefeld, Germany.
FernUniversität in Hagen · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEHochschule Niederrhein · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic mental health services represent innovative instruments to increase the dissemination of stress programs in primary prevention. However, little is known about facilitators of their uptake. This study aimed to explore determinants of the acceptance of centrally certified digital stress coping programs and preferences for service delivery modes among adult members of German statutory health insurances. Participants completed a multi-construct 45-item questionnaire covering acceptance of digital stress prevention (behavioral use intention) and potential predictors we assessed using hierarchical regression analysis-(1) socio-demographic variables and time spent online, (2) openness to experience, (3) perceived stress, and (4) attitudes toward e-mental health. Preferences in terms of the willingness to use online, face-to-face and blended programs were analyzed using paired t-tests. Participants (N = 171, 66% female, 18-69 years) reported a moderate acceptance of digital stress management (

Indexed as

acceptability of health careattitude to computerseHealthMental healthmHealthpreventive health servicespsychological stresspublic health

Identifiers

PMID32206013
PMCPMC7074489
OpenAlexW3012110056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.