Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32206000›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Is aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation beneficial in acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized control trials and cohort studies.

Mohamed M Gad, C Roberto Simons-Linares

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Contemporary Approach to Acute Pancreatitis in Emergency Medicine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed M GadInternal Medicine Department, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
C Roberto Simons-LinaresGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States. robertosimons@outlook.com.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is conflincting evidence on the intravenous fluid (IVF) strategy for acute pancreatitis (AP). We perform a metaanalysis of the available evidence.

aimTo investigate if aggressive IVF therapy in AP patients is beneficial to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.

methodsMetaanalysis of available randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing aggressive IVF

resultsThere was no significant difference in mortality between the aggressive (

conclusionEarly aggressive IVF therapy did not improve mortality. Moreover, aggressive IVF therapy could potentially increase the risk for acute kidney injury and pulmonary edema leading to respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation. Studies are needed to investigate which subset of AP patients could benefit from aggressive IVF therapy.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAcute Kidney InjuryAdministration, IntravenousCohort StudiesFluid TherapyHumansIncidencePancreatitisPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingPulmonary EdemaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResuscitationSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeTreatment OutcomeAcute pancreatitisAggressive fluid resuscitationIntravenous fluid resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID32206000
PMCPMC7081000
OpenAlexW3011372268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.