Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32205971›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2020

Evaluation of Iron Status in Patients of Solid Organ Malignancies: Study from a Cancer Research Centre.

Deepak Sundriyal, Priya P Nayak, Lima Arya, Meenu Walia, Rajat Saha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of anemia and its association with functional status and depression in geriatric patients with solid organ cancers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comorbidity in Older Patients Hospitalized with Cancer in Northeast China based on Hospital Discharge Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deepak Sundriyal1All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India.ORCID 0000-0002-6378-7694
Priya P Nayak2IMS and Sum Hospital, Bhubaneshwar, India.
Lima Arya3Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Meenu Walia3Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Rajat Saha3Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anemia associated with cancer is a major public health issue. The gravity of this problem is likely to be higher in India due to already existing malnutrition in the general population. Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) as a subset has not been evaluated in Indian population of cancer patients. This study was undertaken to evaluate iron status among newly diagnosed advanced-stage cancer patients with anemia at a cancer research institute in India. Sixty-four patients of anemia were identified who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Iron status was noted. Absolute iron deficiency (AID) was identified in 8 (12.5%) patients. Functional iron deficiency (FID) was seen in 48 (75%) patients. Probable functional iron deficiency (PFID) was seen in 2 (3.1%) patients while no iron deficiency (NID) was seen in 6 (9.3%) patients. FID is seen in majority of advanced-stage solid organ cancer patients in India. Large sample studies are required to better define the exact prevalence of iron deficiency, chemotherapy-induced anemia, and anemia in cancer subtypes.

Indexed as

Anemia in cancerFunctional iron deficiencyIron deficiency anemia

Identifiers

PMID32205971
PMCPMC7064694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.