Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32205966›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2020

Breast Anthropometry-Results of a Prospective Study Among Indian Breast Cancer Patients.

Praveen Royal Mokkapati, Manoj Gowda, Suryanarayana Deo, Ekta Dhamija, Sanjay Thulkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Praveen Royal Mokkapati1Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Manoj Gowda1Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Suryanarayana Deo1Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1955-8234
Ekta Dhamija2Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Sanjay Thulkar2Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast anthropometry plays an important role in surgical decision-making in the era of breast conservation therapy, oncoplasty and reconstruction. Majority of the currently available breast anthropometry data is from Western countries, and there is a need to evaluate anthropometric data among Indian women to tailor our surgical decision-making and achieve optimum surgical results. Two hundred and thirty-one breast cancer patients were included in this prospective study, and different anthropometric parameters were evaluated to assess and describe the nipple-areola complex, breast shape, size, volume and ptosis. Breast volume was calculated using formula developed by Qiao et al. Outcomes were compared with data available from different countries. Mean breast volume among Indian women was 515 ml. Nearly, 81% of patients had ptosis and up to 40% had grade 3 ptosis. Breast volume among Indian patients can be grouped into three categories based on quartiles (category I-≤ 220 ml, category II-> 220 to ≤ 730 ml, category III-> 730 ml). Overall breast anthropometry data among Indian women was different from the data reported from western studies. Breast anthropometry plays an important role in the surgical decision-making, and results of the study indicate that the anthropometry of Indian women is different from western counterparts.

Indexed as

AnthropometryBreast cancerBreast conservation surgeryBreast reconstructionIndian

Identifiers

PMID32205966
PMCPMC7064648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.