ArticleThe journal of ECT2020
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Active-Duty Service Members Improves Depressive Symptoms.
Article in The journal of ECT, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress on the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Resistant Depression: A Scoping Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCurrent research on the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as a noninvasive therapy for treatment-resistant depression is largely settled science. However, little is known about its efficacy with active-duty service members (ADSMs) with major depressive disorder. In a retrospective chart review, we examined depressive symptom ratings in ADSMs seeking treatment at the US Army Outpatient Behavioral Health Service Clinic at Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, Ga.
methodsWe reviewed 121 consecutive outpatient charts, which yielded 61 ADSMs who completed a minimum of 20 rTMS sessions for refractory depression, and for whom both pretreatment and posttreatment depressive symptom ratings were available. Pre- and post-Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) scores were subjected to a paired t test, and Reliable Change Indices were calculated to determine both reliable and clinical significance.
resultsAverage (SD) pretreatment and posttreatment PHQ-9 scores were 15.8 (6.2) and 12.6 (7.6), respectively. Statistically significant reduction in post-PHQ-9 was demonstrated (P < 0.001), with 69% of patients lowering their ratings and 31% demonstrating reliable change (improvement >5.64). Additionally, 20% demonstrated a reliable change that placed them in the nondysfunctional range (post-PHQ-9 <9.6), demonstrating clinical significance.
conclusionsThese data confirm a course of standard rTMS to ADSMs with major depression is promising in reducing depressive symptoms. Given that success and completion rates from this clinic are similar to those reported in civilian populations (80%), rTMS may be an adequate additional treatment or augmentation strategy for refractory depression in ADSMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.