Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32205348›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2020

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving One or Two Grams of Ceftriaxone Daily.

Andrew Ackerman, Nathaniel R Zook, Jeremy F Siegrist, Charles F Brummitt, Margaret M Cook, Thomas J Dilworth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ceftriaxone 1 g Versus 2 g Daily for the Treatment of Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew AckermanDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Nathaniel R ZookDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Jeremy F SiegristDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Charles F BrummittInfectious Diseases Section, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Margaret M CookDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Thomas J DilworthDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA thomas.dilworth@aah.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7894-586X
Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center · USAurora Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients may experience ceftriaxone underexposure, but clinical outcomes data are lacking. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of ceftriaxone dosing on clinical outcomes among ICU patients without central nervous system (CNS) infection. A retrospective study of ICU patients receiving intravenous, empirical ceftriaxone for non-CNS infections was conducted. Patients ≥18 years of age who received ≤2 g of ceftriaxone daily for ≥72 h were included and categorized as receiving ceftriaxone 1 g or 2 g daily. The primary, composite outcome was treatment failure, defined as inpatient mortality and/or antibiotic escalation due to clinical worsening. Propensity score matching was performed based on the probability of receiving 2 g of ceftriaxone daily. Multivariable logistic regression determined the association between ceftriaxone dose and treatment failure in a propensity-matched cohort. A total of 212 patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort. The most common diagnoses (83.0%) were pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Treatment failure occurred in 17.0% and 5.7% of patients receiving 1 g and 2 g daily, respectively (

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneceftriaxoneclinical outcomesintensive care unitpharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics

Identifiers

PMID32205348
PMCPMC7269488
OpenAlexW3012851603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.