Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32205022›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunology2020

Peptide mimotopes alter T cell function in cancer and autoimmunity.

Jill E Slansky, Maki Nakayama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Peptide-based immunotherapy in lupus: Where are we now?Rheumatology and immunology research · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. APOBEC and Cancer Viroimmunotherapy: Thinking the Unthinkable.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Structurally silent peptide anchor modifications allosterically modulate T cell recognition in a receptor-dependent manner.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jill E SlanskyDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12800 E. 19thAvenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Electronic address: jill.slansky@cuanschutz.edu.
Maki NakayamaDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12800 E. 19thAvenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1775 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Funding

Multiple Autoantigens/Multiple Epitopes of Type 1DMR01DK032083 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MICHELS, AARON W · 1986 to 2025
$6.9M
Molecular Dissection of Insulin Targeting in Anti-Islet AutoimmunityR01DK099317 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AARON W MICHELS, Maki Nakayama · 2013 to 2026
$5.3M
Insulin Specific T Cell Response Shaped by Diabetes Protective MHC Class II MoleculesR01DK108868 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AARON W MICHELS · 2017 to 2026
$3.6M
Functional Activation of Low Affinity TILsR01CA226879 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SLANSKY, JILL E · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226879NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK032083NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099317NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cells recognize and respond to self antigens in both cancer and autoimmunity. One strategy to influence this response is to incorporate amino acid substitutions into these T cell-specific epitopes. This strategy is being reconsidered now with the goal of increasing time to regression with checkpoint blockade therapies in cancer and antigen-specific immunotherapies in autoimmunity. We discuss how these amino acid substitutions change the interactions with the MHC class I or II molecule and the responding T cell repertoire. Amino acid substitutions in epitopes that are the most effective in therapies bind more strongly to T cell receptor and/or MHC molecules and cross-react with the same repertoire of T cells as the natural antigen.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityImmunomodulationAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsCross ReactionsDisease SusceptibilityEpitopesHistocompatibility AntigensHumansMutationNeoplasmsPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesEpitopesHistocompatibility AntigensPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAltered peptide ligandsAutoimmunity antigensHeteroclitic peptidesMolecular mimicryPeptide agonistsPeptide analoguesPeptide mimotopesPeptide variantsTCR-peptide-MHC interactionsTumor antigens

Identifiers

PMID32205022
PMCPMC7160047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.