Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32204744›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

Consumption of ultra-processed foods at 11, 22 and 30 years at the 2004, 1993 and 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohorts.

Caroline Dos Santos Costa, Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção, Juliana Dos Santos Vaz, Fernanda Rauber, Isabel Oliveira Bierhals, Alicia Matijasevich, Bernardo L Horta, Helen Gonçalves, Fernando C Wehrmeister, Iná S Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caroline Dos Santos CostaDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Cecília Formoso AssunçãoPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3rd Floor, Pelotas, RS96020-220, Brazil.
Juliana Dos Santos VazPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3rd Floor, Pelotas, RS96020-220, Brazil.
Fernanda RauberDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabel Oliveira BierhalsPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3rd Floor, Pelotas, RS96020-220, Brazil.
Alicia MatijasevichDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Av. Dr Arnaldo 455, 2nd Floor, São Paulo, SP01246-903, Brazil.
Bernardo L HortaPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3rd Floor, Pelotas, RS96020-220, Brazil.
Helen GonçalvesPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3rd Floor, Pelotas, RS96020-220, Brazil.
Fernando C WehrmeisterPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3rd Floor, Pelotas, RS96020-220, Brazil.
Iná S SantosPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3rd Floor, Pelotas, RS96020-220, Brazil.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 086974/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the consumption of ultra-processed foods according to demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in three birth cohorts.

designCross-sectional analysis.

settingData from the 2004, 1993 and 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohorts were used at 11, 22 and 30 years, respectively, collected between 2012 and 2015. Outcome was the relative contribution of ultra-processed foods from the total daily energy intake. Maternal-independent variables were self-reported skin colour, schooling, age and family income (obtained in the perinatal study), and variables of the cohort member, sex, skin colour, schooling and current family income (the last two obtained at the 11-, 22- and 30-year follow-ups of the respective cohorts). We calculated crude and adjusted means of the outcome for the whole cohorts and according to the independent variables.

participants11-, 22- and 30-year-old individuals.

resultsDaily energetic contribution from ultra-processed foods was higher in the younger cohort (33·7, 29·8 and 25·1 % at 11, 22 and 30 years, respectively). Maternal schooling and family income at birth showed an inverse dose-response relationship at 11 and 22 years, but a positive dose-response at 30 years. Female sex, lower schooling and family income at 22 years and higher schooling at 30 years were associated to a higher contribution from ultra-processed foods in the daily energy intake.

conclusionsInformation from food and nutrition policies needs a higher dissemination, mostly among women and population groups of lower income and schooling, including its promotion in media and health services, aiming for a decreased consumption of ultra-processed foods.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFast FoodsAdolescentAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleFood HandlingHumansIncomeMaleYoung AdultAdolescentsAdultsCohort studiesUltra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID32204744
PMCPMC10195471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.