Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32204724›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2020

Burnout and Joy in the Profession of Critical Care Medicine.

Meeta Prasad Kerlin, Joanne McPeake, Mark E Mikkelsen

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05636371 (Impact of WRitten Communication on the ICU Team Experience), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05636371 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of WRitten Communication on the ICU Team Experience

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled166ConditionsCommunication, Satisfaction, Patient, BurnoutArmsWritten Communication
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hours based scheduling in neonatology: a practical approach.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meeta Prasad KerlinDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joanne McPeakeNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Mark E MikkelsenDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. mark.mikkelsen@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2020. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2020. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.

Indexed as

HappinessBurnout, ProfessionalCritical CareHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID32204724
PMCPMC7092567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.