ReviewCritical care (London, England)2020
Heterogeneity of Cardiovascular Response to Standardized Sepsis Resuscitation.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Septic Cardiomyopathy: Age-Dependent Physiology and Hemodynamic Aspects-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Venous congestion from a vascular waterfall perspective: reframing congestion as a dynamic Starling resistor phenomenon.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- Can Machine Learning Personalize Cardiovascular Therapy in Sepsis?Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Pathophysiological implications of ventriculoarterial coupling in septic shock.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023Review
- Hemodynamic management of septic shock: beyond the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Effective hemodynamic monitoring.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Review
- Assessment of Dynamic Changes in Stressed Volume and Venous Return during Hyperdynamic Septic Shock.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation.Intensive care medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2020. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2020. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.