Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32204487›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Juice, Artificially-Sweetened Soda and Bottled Water: An Australian Population Study.

Caroline Miller, Kerry Ettridge, Melanie Wakefield, Simone Pettigrew, John Coveney, David Roder, Sarah Durkin, Gary Wittert, Jane Martin, Joanne Dono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Evaluating campaign concepts aimed at replacing sugar-sweetened beverages with water.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caroline MillerSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9723-8047
Kerry EttridgeHealth Policy Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Melanie WakefieldCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia, 3004 & School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
Simone PettigrewFood Policy, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney 2042, Australia.
John CoveneyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide 5042, Australia.
David RoderCancer Epidemiology and Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Sarah DurkinCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia, 3004 & School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
Gary WittertDiscipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 5000 & Centre for Nutrition and GI Diseases, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Jane MartinObesity Policy Coalition and Alcohol and Obesity Policy, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Joanne DonoHealth Policy Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide 5000, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant GNT 1120618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing consumption of free sugars, such as those found in high concentrations in manufactured products such as sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and 100% fruit juices, is a global public health priority. This study aimed to measure prevalence of widely available pre-packaged non-alcoholic water-based beverages (carbonated sodas, sports drinks, energy drinks, artificially-sweetened sodas, fruit juices (any type), and bottled water) and to comprehensively examine behavioral, environmental, current health, and demographic correlates of consumption. A cross-sectional, nationally-representative population survey of 3430 Australian adults (18+ years) was conducted using computer-assisted telephone (mobile and landline) interviewing. Past week prevalence of pre-packaged drinks containing free sugar was 47.3%; daily prevalence was 13.6%. Of all the pre-packaged drinks assessed, consumption of fruit juices (any type) was the most prevalent (38.8%), followed by bottled water (37.4%), soda (28.9%), artificially-sweetened soda (18.1%), sports drinks (8.1%), and energy drinks (4.2%). Higher soda consumption was associated with males, younger age, socio-economic disadvantage, frequent takeaway food consumption, availability of soda in the home, obesity, and a diagnosis of heart disease or depression. A diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes was associated with increased likelihood of consuming artificially-sweetened sodas and decreased likelihood of consuming sugar-sweetened soda. SSB consumption is prevalent in Australia, especially among young adults and males, foreshadowing continued population weight gain and high burdens of chronic disease. To reduce consumption, Australia must take a comprehensive approach, incorporating policy reform, effective community education, and active promotion of water.

Indexed as

DrinkingDrinking BehaviorDrinking WaterFruit and Vegetable JuicesSugar-Sweetened BeveragesSweetening AgentsAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultDrinking WaterSweetening Agentsartificially-sweetened beveragesconsumptionfruit juicenational surveysugar-sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID32204487
PMCPMC7146120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.