Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32204453›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Computational Models Using Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Drug Hepatotoxicity with the DILIrank Dataset.

Robert Ancuceanu, Marilena Viorica Hovanet, Adriana Iuliana Anghel, Florentina Furtunescu, Monica Neagu, Carolina Constantin, Mihaela Dinu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert AncuceanuFaculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020956 Bucharest, Romania.
Marilena Viorica HovanetFaculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020956 Bucharest, Romania.
Adriana Iuliana AnghelFaculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020956 Bucharest, Romania.
Florentina FurtunescuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020956 Bucharest, Romania.
Monica NeaguImmunology Laboratory, Victor Babes National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9339-2805
Carolina ConstantinImmunology Laboratory, Victor Babes National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania.
Mihaela DinuFaculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020956 Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInstitutul National Victor Babes · ROUniversity of Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains one of the challenges in the safety profile of both authorized and candidate drugs, and predicting hepatotoxicity from the chemical structure of a substance remains a task worth pursuing. Such an approach is coherent with the current tendency for replacing non-clinical tests with in vitro or in silico alternatives. In 2016, a group of researchers from the FDA published an improved annotated list of drugs with respect to their DILI risk, constituting "the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans" (DILIrank). This paper is one of the few attempting to predict liver toxicity using the DILIrank dataset. Molecular descriptors were computed with the Dragon 7.0 software, and a variety of feature selection and machine learning algorithms were implemented in the R computing environment. Nested (double) cross-validation was used to externally validate the models selected. A total of 78 models with reasonable performance were selected and stacked through several approaches, including the building of multiple meta-models. The performance of the stacked models was slightly superior to other models published. The models were applied in a virtual screening exercise on over 100,000 compounds from the ZINC database and about 20% of them were predicted to be non-hepatotoxic.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualHumansModels, TheoreticalPrognosisQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipDILIDILIrankdrug hepatotoxicityin siliconested cross-validationQSARvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID32204453
PMCPMC7139829
OpenAlexW3008610133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.