Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32204405›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Systematic Review Protocol to Identify the Key Benefits and Associated Program Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations.

Danielle Tracey, Tonia Gray, Joanna Sweeting, Jonathan Kingsley, Aisling Bailey, Philip Pettitt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle TraceyCentre for Educational Research, Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9590-9812
Tonia GrayCentre for Educational Research, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-1748
Joanna SweetingCentre for Educational Research, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia.
Jonathan KingsleySchool of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-7164
Aisling BaileySchool of Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-4770
Philip PettittBotanic Gardens & Centennial Parklands, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Swinburne University of Technology · AUWestern Sydney University · AURoyal Botanic Garden Sydney · AUTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gardening has long been a popular pastime. There is a growing evidence base for the health and well-being benefits of gardening. Community gardening brings a social aspect to gardening, thereby increasing the potential benefits to include addressing social inclusion and poor community health through sharing of values, support of others, and building networks. This systematic review protocol aims to determine the characteristics of community gardening that could lead to beneficial outcomes such as connection with the community and development of new skills. Thirteen academic databases will be searched for studies looking at the benefits of community gardening, with a focus on vulnerable populations. Data will be extracted from all studies meeting the inclusion criteria and summarized to provide an overview of the current literature. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive investigation into community gardening, its benefits, and how they are achieved for the target population. By gathering and synthesizing this information, the review should allow policy makers and practitioners to work more effectively to address health and social inequities, by highlighting areas of need and enabling optimization of future interventions.

Indexed as

GardeningPublic HealthVulnerable PopulationsHumansSystematic Reviews as Topiccommunity gardeninghealthprotocolsocial inclusionsystematic reviewvulnerablewell-being

Identifiers

PMID32204405
PMCPMC7143884
OpenAlexW3011727589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.