Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32204404›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Novel Physiology and Definition of Poor Ovarian Response; Clinical Recommendations.

Antoine Abu-Musa, Thor Haahr, Peter Humaidan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05281341 (Effect of Growth Hormone Administration With Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Expected Poor Responders POSEIDON Group 3 and 4 Undergoing ICSI Using Antagonist Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05281341 phase4completednot on this map

Effect of Growth Hormone Administration With Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Expected Poor Responders POSEIDON Group 3 and 4 Undergoing ICSI Using Antagonist Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled160ConditionsFemale InfertilityArmsGrowth Hormone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antoine Abu-MusaDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Thor HaahrThe Fertility Clinic Skive Regional Hospital, 7800 Skive, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9304-5299
Peter HumaidanThe Fertility Clinic Skive Regional Hospital, 7800 Skive, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6884-5366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor ovarian response (POR) to controlled ovarian stimulation (OS) presents a major challenge in assisted reproduction. The Bologna criteria represented the first serious attempt to set clear criteria for the definition of POR. However, the Bologna criteria were questioned because of the persistent heterogeneity among POR patients and the inability to provide management strategies. Based on these facts, a more recent classification, the POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) classification, was developed to provide a homogeneous and refined definition of POR that significantly reduces the heterogeneity of the Bologna criteria definition of POR and helps in the clinical handling and counseling of patients. In this review, we discuss the impact of the POSEIDON classification on the clinical management of patients with POR.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleOvaryOvulation InductionPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy RateBologna criteriaIVFovarian stimulationpoor ovarian responsePoseidon criteria

Identifiers

PMID32204404
PMCPMC7139860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.