Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32204305›Full record

ReviewCells2020

The

François Hafezi, Danielle Perez Bercoff

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ovarian Sex Cord Tumor With Annular Tubules (SCTAT) Harbor Recurrent Copy Number Alterations, Including Monosomy 22.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The -124C>T Mutation of theCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  9. High Prevalence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. IDH mutant high-grade gliomas.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [Research Progress in Imaging Investigation of TERT Promoter Mutations in Gliomas].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

François HafeziDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 29, rue Henri Koch, L-4354 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Danielle Perez BercoffDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 29, rue Henri Koch, L-4354 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Luxembourg Institute of Health · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reactivation of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) protein is the principal mechanism of telomere maintenance in cancer cells. Mutations in the

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsHumansMutationNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTelomeraseTelomeraseAPOBEC mutationscell immortalizationGBM/gliomamelanomatelomeraseTERT promoter mutationsthyroid cancerUV mutations

Identifiers

PMID32204305
PMCPMC7140675
OpenAlexW3012327466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.