Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32203988›Full record

ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2020

Current status of and trends in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in Korea.

Woo Jin Song, Sang Gue Kang, Eun Key Kim, Seung Yong Song, Joon Seok Lee, Jung Ho Lee, Ung Sik Jin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Decision-making driving factors in breast reconstruction among premenopausal breast cancer patients in China: a Q-methodology study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Breast Cancer Hormone Therapy Modulates Breast Implant Capsular Contracture.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Woo Jin SongDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Gue KangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Key KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Yong SongDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joon Seok LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Jung Ho LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea.
Ung Sik JinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kyungpook National University · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRUlsan College · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

Korean Academic Association of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since April 2015, post-mastectomy breast reconstruction has been covered by the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). The frequency of these procedures has increased very rapidly. We analyzed data obtained from the Big Data Hub of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) and determined annual changes in the number of breast reconstruction procedures and related trends in Korea. We evaluated the numbers of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures performed between April 2015 and December 2018 using data from the HIRA Big Data Hub. We determined annual changes in the numbers of total, autologous, and implant breast reconstructions after NHIS coverage commenced. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. The post-mastectomy breast reconstruction rate increased from 19.4% in 2015 to 53.4% in 2018. In 2015, implant reconstruction was performed in 1,366 cases and autologous reconstruction in 905 (60.1% and 39.8%, respectively); these figures increased to 3,703 and 1,570 (70.2% and 29.7%, respectively) in 2018. Free tissue transfer and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap creation were the most common autologous reconstruction procedures. For implant-based reconstructions, the rates of directto-implant and tissue-expander breast reconstructions (first stage) were similar in 2018. This study summarizes breast reconstruction trends in Korea after NHIS coverage was expanded in 2015. A significant increase over time in the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction rate was evident, with a trend toward implant-based reconstruction. Analysis of data from the HIRA Big Data Hub can be used to predict breast reconstruction trends and convey precise information to patients and physicians.

Indexed as

Big dataBreast neoplasmsInsuranceMammaplastyStatistics

Identifiers

PMID32203988
PMCPMC7093270
OpenAlexW3011613527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.