Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32203532›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The impact of low- versus high-intensity surveillance cystoscopy on surgical care and cancer outcomes in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Michael E Rezaee, Kristine E Lynch, Zhongze Li, Todd A MacKenzie, John D Seigne, Douglas J Robertson, Brenda Sirovich, Philip P Goodney, Florian R Schroeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. UrinaryCancers · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael E RezaeeWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6236-8682
Kristine E LynchVA Salt Lake City Health Care System and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Zhongze LiBiomedical Data Science Department, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States of America.
Todd A MacKenzieBiomedical Data Science Department, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States of America.
John D SeigneWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, United States of America.
Douglas J RobertsonWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, United States of America.
Brenda SirovichWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, United States of America.
Philip P GoodneyWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, United States of America.
Florian R SchroeckWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, United States of America.
Dartmouth College · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
HSRD VA I01 HX001880HSRD VA I01 HX002780NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the association of low- vs. guideline-recommended high-intensity cystoscopic surveillance with outcomes among patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS &

methodsA retrospective cohort study of Veterans Affairs patients diagnosed with high-risk NMIBC between 2005 and 2011 with follow-up through 2014. Patients were categorized by number of surveillance cystoscopies over two years following diagnosis: low- (1-5) vs. high-intensity (6 or more) surveillance. Propensity score adjusted regression models were used to assess the association of low-intensity cystoscopic surveillance with frequency of transurethral resections, and risk of progression to invasive disease and bladder cancer death.

resultsAmong 1,542 patients, 520 (33.7%) underwent low-intensity cystoscopic surveillance. Patients undergoing low-intensity surveillance had fewer transurethral resections (37 vs. 99 per 100 person-years; p<0.001). Risk of death from bladder cancer did not differ significantly by low (cumulative incidence [CIn] 8.4% [95% CI 6.5-10.9) at 5 years) vs. high-intensity surveillance (CIn 9.1% [95% CI 7.4-11.2) at 5 years, p = 0.61). Low vs. high-intensity surveillance was not associated with increased risk of bladder cancer death among patients with Ta (CIn 5.7% vs. 8.2% at 5 years p = 0.24) or T1 disease at diagnosis (CIn 10.2% vs. 9.1% at 5 years, p = 0.58). Among patients with Ta disease, low-intensity surveillance was associated with decreased risk of progression to invasive disease (T1 or T2) or bladder cancer death (CIn 19.3% vs. 31.3% at 5 years, p = 0.002).

conclusionsPatients with high-risk NMIBC undergoing low- vs. high-intensity cystoscopic surveillance underwent fewer transurethral resections, but did not experience an increased risk of progression or bladder cancer death. These findings provide a strong rationale for a clinical trial to determine whether low-intensity surveillance is comparable to high-intensity surveillance for cancer control in high-risk NMIBC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Transitional CellCystoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32203532
PMCPMC7089561
OpenAlexW3012878965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.