Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32203507›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Schistosoma species detection by environmental DNA assays in African freshwaters.

Hind Alzaylaee, Rupert A Collins, Gabriel Rinaldi, Asilatu Shechonge, Benjamin Ngatunga, Eric R Morgan, Martin J Genner

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hind AlzaylaeeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rupert A CollinsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9135-1169
Gabriel RinaldiWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Asilatu ShechongeTanzania Fisheries Research Institute (TAFIRI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Benjamin NgatungaTanzania Fisheries Research Institute (TAFIRI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Eric R MorganSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Martin J GennerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1117-9168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchistosomiasis is a neglected tropical parasitic disease associated with severe pathology, mortality and economic loss worldwide. Programs for disease control may benefit from specific and sensitive diagnostic methods to detect Schistosoma trematodes in aquatic environments. Here we report the development of novel environmental DNA (eDNA) qPCR assays for the presence of the human-infecting species Schistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium and S. japonicum. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe first tested the specificity of the assays across the three species using genomic DNA preparations which showed successful amplification of target sequences with no cross amplification between the three focal species. In addition, we evaluated the specificity of the assays using synthetic DNA of multiple Schistosoma species, and demonstrated a high overall specificity; however, S. japonicum and S. haematobium assays showed cross-species amplification with very closely-related species. We next tested the effectiveness of the S. mansoni assay using eDNA samples from aquaria containing infected host gastropods, with the target species revealed as present in all infected aquaria. Finally, we evaluated the effectiveness of the S. mansoni and S. haematobium assays using eDNA samples from eight discrete natural freshwater sites in Tanzania, and demonstrated strong correspondence between infection status established using eDNA and conventional assays of parasite prevalence in host snails. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Collectively, our results suggest that eDNA monitoring is able to detect schistosomes in freshwater bodies, but refinement of the field sampling, storage and assay methods are likely to optimise its performance. We anticipate that environmental DNA-based approaches will help to inform epidemiological studies and contribute to efforts to control and eliminate schistosomiasis in endemic areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, EnvironmentalDNA, HelminthEnvironmental MonitoringFresh WaterGenes, HelminthNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPhylogenyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSchistosomaSchistosoma haematobiumSchistosoma japonicumSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasisSchistosomiasis mansoniSnailsDNA, EnvironmentalDNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID32203507
PMCPMC7117781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.