Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32203388›Full record

ArticleNature methods2020

Cardelino: computational integration of somatic clonal substructure and single-cell transcriptomes.

Davis J McCarthy, Raghd Rostom, Yuanhua Huang, Daniel J Kunz, Petr Danecek, Marc Jan Bonder, Tzachi Hagai, Ruqian Lyu, HipSci Consortium, Wenyi Wang and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Davis J McCarthy *European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-6833
Raghd Rostom *European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Yuanhua Huang *European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3124-9186
Daniel J KunzWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-6591
Petr DanecekWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Marc Jan BonderEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Tzachi HagaiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Ruqian LyuSt Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
HipSci Consortium
Wenyi WangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel J GaffneyWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-1862
Benjamin D SimonsDepartment of Physics, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-7071
Oliver StegleEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK. o.stegle@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8818-7193
Sarah A TeichmannEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK. st9@sanger.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6294-6366
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MC_PC_17230Wellcome Trust 203828/Z/16/AWellcome Trust 203828/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT206194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bulk and single-cell DNA sequencing has enabled reconstructing clonal substructures of somatic tissues from frequency and cooccurrence patterns of somatic variants. However, approaches to characterize phenotypic variations between clones are not established. Here we present cardelino (https://github.com/single-cell-genetics/cardelino), a computational method for inferring the clonal tree configuration and the clone of origin of individual cells assayed using single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq). Cardelino flexibly integrates information from imperfect clonal trees inferred based on bulk exome-seq data, and sparse variant alleles expressed in scRNA-seq data. We apply cardelino to a published cancer dataset and to newly generated matched scRNA-seq and exome-seq data from 32 human dermal fibroblast lines, identifying hundreds of differentially expressed genes between cells from different somatic clones. These genes are frequently enriched for cell cycle and proliferation pathways, indicating a role for cell division genes in somatic evolution in healthy skin.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsCell CycleCell ProliferationFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMelanomaMutationSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID32203388
OpenAlexW3010981820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.