ArticleHeredity2020
The complex genetic architecture of male mate choice evolution between Drosophila species.
Article in Heredity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Courtship song differs between African and European populations of Drosophila melanogaster and involves a strong effect locus.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Two major-effect loci influence interspecific mating in females of the sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetics and the Evolution of Prezygotic Isolation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Evolution of assortative mating following selective introgression of pigmentation genes between twoEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- The genetic architecture of temperature adaptation is shaped by population ancestry and not by selection regime.Genome biology · 2021Article
- The comparative genomic landscape of adaptive radiation in crater lake cichlid fishes.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- Light dependent courtship behavior inPeerJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mate choice behaviors are among the most important reproductive isolating barriers in many animals. Little is known about the genetic basis of reproductively isolating behaviors, but examples to date provide evidence that they can have a simple genetic basis. However, it is unclear if these results indicate that individual genes with large effects are common, or are instead due to ascertainment biases. Here, we present the results of a QTL mapping study for the most important behavioral isolating barrier between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia: male mate choice. Our QTL results initially suggested that differences in male mate choice may be due to a couple loci with large effects. However, as we divided the largest-effect QTL using stable introgression strains, we found evidence of multiple interacting loci. We further find that separate regions of the genome control different aspects of male choice. Taken together, our results suggest that the genetic architecture of mate choice behavior, in this case, is more complex than QTL mapping suggested, highlighting potential challenges to future mapping studies. We discuss the implications of these results as they relate to signal-receiver coevolution, mate choice, and reproductive isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.