Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32203249›Full record

ArticleHeredity2020

Larger bacterial populations evolve heavier fitness trade-offs and undergo greater ecological specialization.

Yashraj Chavhan, Sarthak Malusare, Sutirth Dey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mutations in the circadian cycle drive adaptive plasticity in cyanobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the expanse between theoretical questions and experimental approaches in the modern study of evolvability.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yashraj ChavhanIndian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Pune, Dr Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, Maharashtra, 411008, India.
Sarthak MalusareIndian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Pune, Dr Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, Maharashtra, 411008, India.
Sutirth DeyIndian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Pune, Dr Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, Maharashtra, 411008, India. s.dey@iiserpune.ac.in.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology (DBT) BT/PR22328/BRB/10/1569/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary studies over the last several decades have invoked fitness trade-offs to explain why species prefer some environments to others. However, the effects of population size on trade-offs and ecological specialization remain largely unknown. To complicate matters, trade-offs themselves have been visualized in multiple ways in the literature. Thus, it is not clear how population size can affect the various aspects of trade-offs. To address these issues, we conducted experimental evolution with Escherichia coli populations of two different sizes in two nutritionally limited environments, and studied fitness trade-offs from three different perspectives. We found that larger populations evolved greater fitness trade-offs, regardless of how trade-offs are conceptualized. Moreover, although larger populations adapted more to their selection conditions, they also became more maladapted to other environments, ultimately paying heavier costs of adaptation. To enhance the generalizability of our results, we further investigated the evolution of ecological specialization across six different environmental pairs, and found that larger populations specialized more frequently and evolved consistently steeper reaction norms of fitness. This is the first study to demonstrate a relationship between population size and fitness trade-offs, and the results are important in understanding the population genetics of ecological specialization and vulnerability to environmental changes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalDirected Molecular EvolutionEscherichia coliGenetic FitnessGenetics, PopulationPopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID32203249
PMCPMC7239931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.