Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32203203›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2020

Self-reported hearing loss questions provide a good measure for genetic studies: a polygenic risk score analysis from UK Biobank.

Stacey S Cherny, Gregory Livshits, Helena R R Wells, Maxim B Freidin, Ida Malkin, Sally J Dawson, Frances M K Williams

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Polygenic Risk Scores and Hearing Loss Phenotypes in Children.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Missense Variant inBiomedicines · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stacey S ChernyDepartment of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gregory LivshitsDepartment of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Helena R R WellsDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Maxim B FreidinDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course Science, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-6259
Ida MalkinDepartment of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sally J DawsonCentre for Auditory Research, UCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4421-2043
Frances M K WilliamsDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course Science, King's College London, London, UK. frances.williams@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBTel Aviv University · ILUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related hearing impairment (ARHI) is very common in older adults and has major impact on quality of life. The heritability of ARHI has been estimated to be around 50%. The present study aimed to estimate heritability and environmental contributions to liability of ARHI and the extent to which a polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from a recent genome-wide association study of questionnaire items regarding hearing loss using the UK Biobank is predictive of hearing loss in other samples. We examined (1) a sample from TwinsUK who have had hearing ability measured by pure-tone audiogram and the speech-to-noise ratio test as well as questionnaire measures that are comparable with the UK Biobank questionnaire items and (2) European and non-European samples from the UK Biobank which were not part of the original GWAS. Results indicated that the questionnaire items were over 50% heritable in TwinsUK and comparable with the objective hearing measures. In addition, we found very high genetic correlation (0.30-0.84) between the questionnaire responses and objective hearing measures in the TwinsUK sample. Finally, PRS computed from weighted UK Biobank GWAS results were predictive of both questionnaire and objective measures of hearing loss in the TwinsUK sample, as well as questionnaire-measured hearing loss in Europeans but not non-European subpopulations. These results demonstrate the utility of questionnaire-based methods in genetic association studies of hearing loss in adults and highlight the differences in genetic predisposition to ARHI by ethnic background.

Indexed as

Multifactorial InheritanceQuantitative Trait LociSelf ReportAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPresbycusisTwins, DizygoticTwins, MonozygoticUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID32203203
PMCPMC7382483
OpenAlexW3011857650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.