Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32203174›Full record

SynthesisJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

Comparing mortality risk models in VLBW and preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jennifer S McLeod, Anitha Menon, Niki Matusko, Gary M Weiner, Samir K Gadepalli, John Barks, George B Mychaliska, Erin E Perrone

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. The elusive biomarker.Pediatric research · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparison of different neonatal illness severity scores in predicting mortality risk of extremely low birth weight infants.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer S McLeod *Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Anitha Menon *University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Niki MatuskoDepartment of Surgery Statistics, University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Gary M WeinerUniversity of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Samir K GadepalliDepartment of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-8723
John BarksUniversity of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
George B MychaliskaDepartment of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Erin E PerroneDepartment of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. eperrone@med.umich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the prognostic accuracy of six neonatal illness severity scores (CRIB, CRIB II, SNAP, SNAP II, SNAP-PE, and SNAP-PE II), birthweight (BW), and gestational age (GA) for predicting pre-discharge mortality among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g) and very preterm infants (<32 weeks' gestational age). STUDY

designPubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were the data sources searched for studies published before January 2019. Data were extracted, pooled, and analyzed using random-effects models and reported as AUC with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsOf 1659 screened studies, 24 met inclusion criteria. CRIB was the most discriminate for predicting pre-discharge mortality [AUC 0.88 (0.86-0.90)]. GA was the least discriminate [AUC 0.76 (0.72-0.80)].

conclusionsAlthough the original CRIB score was the most accurate predictor of pre-discharge mortality, significant heterogeneity between studies lowers confidence in this pooled estimate. A more precise illness severity score to predict pre-discharge mortality is still needed.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightBirth WeightGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.