Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32203018›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2020

CohereNet: A Deep Learning Architecture for Ultrasound Spatial Correlation Estimation and Coherence-Based Beamforming.

Alycen Wiacek, Eduardo Gonzalez, Muyinatu A Lediju Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatial Coherence in Medical Ultrasound: A Review.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Deep Learning for Ultrasound Image Formation: CUBDL Evaluation Framework and Open Datasets.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluating Input Domain and Model Selection for Deep Network Ultrasound Beamforming.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alycen Wiacek
Eduardo Gonzalez
Muyinatu A Lediju Bell

Funding

A Machine Learning Alternative to Beamforming to Improve Ultrasound Image Quality for Interventional Access to the KidneyR21EB025621 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MUYINATU A. LEDIJU · 2018 to 2021
$859k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB025621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep fully connected networks are often considered "universal approximators" that are capable of learning any function. In this article, we utilize this particular property of deep neural networks (DNNs) to estimate normalized cross correlation as a function of spatial lag (i.e., spatial coherence functions) for applications in coherence-based beamforming, specifically short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC) beamforming. We detail the composition, assess the performance, and evaluate the computational efficiency of CohereNet, our custom fully connected DNN, which was trained to estimate the spatial coherence functions of in vivo breast data from 18 unique patients. CohereNet performance was evaluated on in vivo breast data from three additional patients who were not included during training, as well as data from in vivo liver and tissue mimicking phantoms scanned with a variety of ultrasound transducer array geometries and two different ultrasound systems. The mean correlation between the SLSC images computed on a central processing unit (CPU) and the corresponding DNN SLSC images created with CohereNet was 0.93 across the entire test set. The DNN SLSC approach was up to 3.4 times faster than the CPU SLSC approach, with similar computational speed, less variability in computational times, and improved image quality compared with a graphical processing unit (GPU)-based SLSC approach. These results are promising for the application of deep learning to estimate correlation functions derived from ultrasound data in multiple areas of ultrasound imaging and beamforming (e.g., speckle tracking, elastography, and blood flow estimation), possibly replacing GPU-based approaches in low-power, remote, and synchronization-dependent applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBreastFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32203018
PMCPMC8034551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.