ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2020
Application of integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the prognostic factors of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with positron emission tomography, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhancement and combined model.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative parameters derived fromNeuroradiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study was designed to investigate the distribution of the independent parameters of PET and MR in tumour differentiation and staging and to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the independent parameters and combined model of PET/MR in the tumour differentiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
methodsThe patients with the preliminary diagnosis of HNSCC were included and underwent the integrated PET/MR The parameters included the diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhancement and PET. The correlations between different parameters and the distribution in groups of tumour differentiation and staging were analysed. The combined model was established with complementary PET/MR parameters. The diagnostic efficiency of the independent parameters and combined model in the tumour differentiation were analysed by receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsThe correlations between the parameters of dynamic contrast enhancement and PET were most significant. There were significant differences between the well-differentiated group and the moderately/poorly differentiated group in terms of the mean values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardised uptake value (SUV) (
conclusionsCompared with the independent parameter, the combination of multiple parameters with PET/MR can further improve the diagnostic performance of tumour differentiation in HNSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.