Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32202302›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2020

Molecular detection of methicillin heat-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in pasteurized camel milk in Saudi Arabia.

Amani H Aljahani, Khaloud M Alarjani, Zeinab K Hassan, Manal F Elkhadragy, Elsayed A Ismail, Abdulrahman H Al-Masoud, Hany M Yehia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial-resistant foodborne pathogens in the Middle East: a systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Methicillin-resistantVeterinary world · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular detection of methicillin-resistantVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Methicillin-ResistantVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amani H AljahaniDepartment of Physical Sport Science, Nutrition and Food Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Saudi Arabia.
Khaloud M AlarjaniDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
Zeinab K HassanCancer Biology Department, Virology and Immunolgy Unit, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
Manal F ElkhadragyBiology Department, Faculty of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Elsayed A IsmailDepartment of Dairy Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Benha 13518, Egypt.
Abdulrahman H Al-MasoudFood Science and Nutrition Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hany M YehiaFood Science and Nutrition Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SABenha University · EGCairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic- and heat-resistant bacteria in camel milk is a potential public health problem. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is an opportunistic pathogen in humans, dairy cattle and camels. We characterized the phenotype and genotype of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal strains recovered from pasteurized and raw camel milk (as control) distributed in the retail markets of Saudi Arabia. Of the 100 samples assessed between March and May 2016, 20 S. aureus isolates were recovered from pasteurized milk, 10 of which were resistant to cefoxitin, and as such, were methicillin-resistant. However, raw camel milk did not contain methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Antimicrobial susceptibility tests showed that the resistance ratio for other antibiotics was 60%. We performed a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay using primers for the methicillin-resistant gene mecA and nucleotide sequencing to detect and verify the methicillin-resistant strains. Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) analysis of the gene sequences showed a 96-100% similarity between the resistant isolates and the S. aureus CS100 strain's mecA gene. Ten of the methicillin-resistant isolates were heat-resistant and were stable at temperatures up to 85°C for 60 s, and three of these were resistant at 90°C for 60 or 90 s. The mean decimal reduction time (D85-value) was 111 s for the ten isolates. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) showed that there was no difference in the total protein profiles for the ten methicillin heat-resistant S. aureus (MHRSA) isolates and for S. aureus ATCC 29737. In conclusion, a relatively high percentage of the tested pasteurized camel milk samples contained S. aureus (20%) and MHRSA (10%).

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCamelusCefoxitinDNA, BacterialHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMilkPasteurizationPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPolymerase Chain ReactionSaudi ArabiaStaphylococcal Food PoisoningBacterial ProteinsCefoxitinDNA, BacterialmecA protein, Staphylococcus aureusPenicillin-Binding ProteinsD-valuemecA genemethicillin-heat resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MHRSA)Pasteurized camel milkpolymerase chain reaction (PCR)SDS-PAGE

Identifiers

PMID32202302
PMCPMC7167254
OpenAlexW3012842643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.