Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32202163›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies

Motivational Interviewing to Increase Physical Activity Behavior in Cancer Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials.

Alexis Lion, Anne Backes, Caroline Duhem, Fernand Ries, Charles Delagardelle, Axel Urhausen, Claus Vögele, Daniel Theisen, Laurent Malisoux

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexis LionFédération Luxembourgeoise des Associations de Sport de Santé, Strassen, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-3807-5177
Anne BackesLuxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Caroline DuhemCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Fernand RiesCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Charles DelagardelleFédération Luxembourgeoise des Associations de Sport de Santé, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Axel UrhausenLuxembourg Institute of Research in Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Science, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Claus VögeleUniversity of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Daniel TheisenLuxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Laurent MalisouxLuxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-5630
Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LULuxembourg Institute of Health · LUUniversity of Luxembourg · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed at evaluating the feasibility and potential efficacy of a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention to increase physical activity (PA) behavior in cancer patients.

methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to an experimental group with standard care plus 12 MI sessions within 12 weeks or a control group with standard care only. The number of recruited participants and the modality of recruitment were recorded to describe the reach of the study. The acceptability of the study was estimated using the attrition rate during the intervention phase. The potential efficacy of the intervention was evaluated by analyzing the PA behavior.

resultsTwenty-five participants were recruited within the 16-month recruitment period (1.6 participants per month). Five participants (38.5%) from the experimental group (n = 13) and one participant (8.3%) from the control group (n = 12) dropped out of the study before the end of the intervention phase. No group by time interaction effect for PA behavior was observed at the end of the intervention.

conclusionDue to the low recruitment rate and compliance, no conclusion can be drawn regarding the efficacy of MI to increase PA behavior in cancer patients. Moreover, the current literature cannot provide any evidence on the effectiveness of MI to increase PA in cancer survivors. Future RCTs should consider that the percentage of uninterested patients to join the study may be as high as 60%. Overrecruitment (30% to 40%) is also recommended to accommodate the elevated attrition rate.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorNeoplasmsPatient ComplianceAccelerometryAttitude to HealthBehavior ControlFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationMotivational InterviewingPhysical Fitnessaccelerometrycancerfitnessmotivationphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID32202163
PMCPMC7092651
OpenAlexW3013763794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.