Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32202129›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2021

Skin Reaction Report Form: Development and Design of a Standardized Report Form for Skin Reactions Due to Medical Devices for Diabetes Management.

Guido Freckmann, Sina Buck, Delia Waldenmaier, Eva Zschornack, Manuela Link, Nina Jendrike, Ines Obstfelder, Sara Vetrugno, Stefanie Kamann, Cornelia Haug

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guido FreckmannInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-9529
Sina BuckInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8428-1038
Delia WaldenmaierInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3280-2369
Eva ZschornackInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.
Manuela LinkInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.
Nina JendrikeInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.
Ines ObstfelderInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.
Sara VetrugnoInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.
Stefanie KamannDermatology and Allergology, Feldafing, Germany.
Cornelia HaugInstitut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin reactions due to medical devices for diabetes management have become a common problem in diabetes technology. There is a varying degree in how detailed skin reactions are described in scientific literature and diabetes practice, and no uniform structured documentation is given. Whereas most articles only describe findings, some others already document final diagnoses, such as contact dermatitis. Furthermore, inconsistent wordings for comparable issues were used.

methodsA more detailed and standardized documentation, possibly facilitated by a generally accepted guideline for structured descriptions, of skin reactions could be helpful to enable better differentiations between the described skin reactions. Therefore, a report form to assess skin reactions due to medical devices in diabetes therapy was developed and will be presented in this article.

resultsThe one-page report form is divided into four categories and a separate instruction paper. Beside general information the form includes the location, size, severity and duration of skin appearances, the grading of itching, and suspected diagnoses.

conclusionA consistent use of the form in daily practice and clinical trials could facilitate a fast and standardized documentation and help to evaluate the occurrence and severity of different skin reactions due to medical devices in diabetes management.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, ContactDiabetes MellitusHumansreport formskin reactionskin-related issues

Identifiers

PMID32202129
PMCPMC8258512
OpenAlexW3012718776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.