Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32202022›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of heart failure2020

Increased resting heart rate and prognosis in treatment-naïve unselected cancer patients: results from a prospective observational study.

Markus S Anker, Maria K Frey, Georg Goliasch, Philipp E Bartko, Suriya Prausmüller, Heinz Gisslinger, Gabriela Kornek, Guido Strunk, Markus Raderer, Christoph Zielinski and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus S AnkerDepartment of Cardiology & Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Maria K FreyDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Clinical Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Georg GoliaschDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Clinical Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp E BartkoDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Clinical Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Suriya PrausmüllerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Clinical Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Heinz GisslingerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriela KornekDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Guido StrunkDepartment of Complexity Research, Complexity Science Hub, Vienna, Austria.
Markus RadererDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph ZielinskiDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin HülsmannDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Clinical Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Noemi PavoDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Clinical Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHochschule Campus Wien · AT

Funding

Medical University of Vienna
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCancer patients suffer from impaired cardiovascular function. Elevated resting heart rate (RHR) has been identified as a marker for increased long-term mortality in cancer patients prior to the receipt of anticancer treatment. We aimed to establish whether RHR is associated with survival in treatment-naïve cancer patients. METHODS AND

resultsThis prospective study enrolled 548 unselected treatment-naïve cancer patients between 2011 and 2013. The median age of the cohort was 62 years; 40.9% were male and 32.7% had metastatic disease. Median RHR was 72 b.p.m. Most patients were in sinus rhythm (n = 507, 92.5%). Clinical heart failure was noted in 37 (6.8%) patients. RHR was not related to cancer stage (P = 0.504). Patients in the highest RHR tertile had higher levels of high-sensitivity troponin (P = 0.003) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P = 0.039). During a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 16-32 months; range: 0-40 months), 185 (33.8%) patients died from any cause [1-year-mortality: 17%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13-20%]. In univariate survival analysis, RHR predicted all-cause mortality [crude hazard ratio (HR) for a 5 b.p.m. increase in RHR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15; P < 0.001], and remained significantly associated with outcome after adjustment for age, gender, tumour entity, tumour stage, cardiac status and haemoglobin (adjusted HR for a 5 b.p.m. increase in RHR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.16; P < 0.001). There was no significant impact of metastatic/non-metastatic disease state on the predictive value of RHR (P = 0.433 for interaction). In subgroup analyses, the strongest associations for RHR with mortality were observed in lung (crude HR 1.14; P = 0.007) and gastrointestinal (crude HR 1.31; P < 0.001) cancer.

conclusionsTreatment-naïve cancer patients with higher RHRs display higher levels of cardiovascular biomarkers. RHR was independently associated with all-cause mortality, especially in lung and gastrointestinal cancers. Elevated RHR and cardiovascular biomarkers may represent early signs of incipient cardiac dysfunction.

Indexed as

Heart FailureNeoplasmsAgedFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsElectrocardiogramResting heart rateSurvivalTreatment-naïve cancer patients

Identifiers

PMID32202022
PMCPMC7540544
OpenAlexW3012928088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.