Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32201935›Full record

ReviewThe Australasian journal of dermatology2020

Facial aesthetic injections in clinical practice: Pretreatment and posttreatment consensus recommendations to minimise adverse outcomes.

Greg J Goodman, Steven Liew, Peter Callan, Sarah Hart

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Advances in Poly-l-lactic Acid Injections for Facial and Neck Rejuvenation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Greg J GoodmanMonash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-9690
Steven LiewShape Clinic, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter CallanPrivate Practice, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah HartSkin Institute, Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand.
Geelong Hospital · AUMonash University · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial aesthetic treatment with injectable neuromodulators and hyaluronic acid fillers is well established, with favourable safety profiles and consistent outcomes. As with any medical treatment, adverse events and complications may occur. Adverse events associated with these products are typically transient and mild to moderate in severity. Serious adverse events, such as infection and intravascular occlusion, are rare. Proper patient selection, consent and counselling, preparation and impeccable injection technique are important risk reduction strategies. Both clinicians and patients must be alert to the signs and symptoms of complications so that appropriate treatment can be started promptly. In this article, the authors review the current literature and provide their consensus recommendations for minimising adverse outcomes when treating patients with botulinum toxin or hyaluronic acid fillers.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AContusionsCosmetic TechniquesDermal FillersDirective CounselingEdemaErythemaFaceHematomaHumansHyaluronic AcidInjectionsInjection Site ReactionNeuromuscular AgentsPainPatient Education as TopicBotulinum Toxins, Type ADermal FillersHyaluronic AcidNeuromuscular Agentsbotulinum toxindermal fillershyaluronic acidneuromodulatorsrejuvenation

Identifiers

PMID32201935
PMCPMC7497045
OpenAlexW3012792130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.