ArticleEJNMMI research2020
Standardized image quality for
Article in EJNMMI research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomized, Factorial Phase II Study to Determine the Optimal Dosing Regimen forJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Trial
- Can the BMI-based dose regimen be used to reduce injection activity and to obtain a constant image quality in oncological patients byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Trial
- Optimization of Administered Activity forWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of patient size on image quality of OSEM3D and BSREM reconstructions in [EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Multiparametric MRI for characterization of the tumour microenvironment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Reduction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Feasibility of a deep learning algorithm to achieve the low-doseThe British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Optimization of the Acquisition Time and Injected Dose ofWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Monte Carlo investigation of PET [Heliyon · 2023Article
- Potential clinical utility ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- A personal acquisition time regimen ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022Article
- Occupational radiation exposure assessment during the management of [EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Highly variable biodistribution ofHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2022Article
- Two birds with one stone: can [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT image quality be improved through BMI-adjusted injected activity without increasing acquisition times?The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- A dedicated paediatric [EJNMMI research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) imaging with
methodsTwenty-one patients (12 males, 9 females) were prospectively included for
resultsOf all patient-dependent parameters, body mass showed the strongest correlation (R
conclusionBody mass can be used to predict
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.