ArticleProceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Multimedia, with co-located Symposium & Workshops. ACM International Conference on Multimedia2019
Mutual Correlation Attentive Factors in Dyadic Fusion Networks for Speech Emotion Recognition.
Article in Proceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Multimedia, with co-located Symposium & Workshops. ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CMU-MOSEAS: A Multimodal Language Dataset for Spanish, Portuguese, German and French.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotion recognition in dyadic communication is challenging because: 1. Extracting informative modality-specific representations requires disparate feature extractor designs due to the heterogenous input data formats. 2. How to effectively and efficiently fuse unimodal features and learn associations between dyadic utterances are critical to the model generalization in actual scenario. 3. Disagreeing annotations prevent previous approaches from precisely predicting emotions in context. To address the above issues, we propose an efficient dyadic fusion network that only relies on an attention mechanism to select representative vectors, fuse modality-specific features, and learn the sequence information. Our approach has three distinct characteristics: 1. Instead of using a recurrent neural network to extract temporal associations as in most previous research, we introduce multiple sub-view attention layers to compute the relevant dependencies among sequential utterances; this significantly improves model efficiency. 2. To improve fusion performance, we design a learnable mutual correlation factor inside each attention layer to compute associations across different modalities. 3. To overcome the label disagreement issue, we embed the labels from all annotators into a k-dimensional vector and transform the categorical problem into a regression problem; this method provides more accurate annotation information and fully uses the entire dataset. We evaluate the proposed model on two published multimodal emotion recognition datasets: IEMOCAP and MELD. Our model significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art research by 3.8%-7.5% accuracy, using a more efficient model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.