Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32201737›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2020

Contemporary hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume optimization, and endpoints of resuscitation: an AAST critical care committee clinical consensus.

Niels D Martin, Panna Codner, Wendy Greene, Karen Brasel, Christopher Michetti, AAST Critical Care Committee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Serial Lactate in Clinical Medicine - A Narrative Review.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niels D MartinDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-0825
Panna CodnerMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Wendy GreeneDepartment of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Karen BraselDepartment of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Christopher MichettiDepartment of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
AAST Critical Care Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article, on hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume assessment, and endpoints of resuscitation, is part of a compendium of guidelines provided by the AAST (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) critical care committee. The intention of these guidelines is to inform practitioners with practical clinical guidance. To do this effectively and contemporarily, expert consensus via the critical care committee was obtained. Strict guideline methodology such a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was purposefully NOT used so as not to limit the possible clinical guidance. The critical care committee foresees this methodology as practically valuable to the bedside clinician.

Identifiers

PMID32201737
PMCPMC7066619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.