Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32201622›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2020

The impacts of combined social and economic empowerment training on intimate partner violence, depression, gender norms and livelihoods among women: an individually randomised controlled trial and qualitative study in Afghanistan.

Andrew Gibbs, Julienne Corboz, Esnat Chirwa, Carron Mann, Fazal Karim, Mohammed Shafiq, Anna Mecagni, Charlotte Maxwell-Jones, Eva Noble, Rachel Jewkes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03236948 (Individually Randomised Control Trial Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Women for Women International), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03236948 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Individually Randomised Control Trial Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Women for Women International (WfWI) Intervention in Afghanistan for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Among Married Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical Research Council, South AfricaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled1,461ConditionsDomestic Violence, Depressive Symptoms, LivelihoodsArmsWomen for Women International Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew GibbsGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2812-5377
Julienne CorbozIndependent consultant, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Esnat ChirwaGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Carron MannWomen for Women International, London, UK.
Fazal KarimWomen for Women International, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Mohammed ShafiqWomen for Women International, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Anna MecagniWomen for Women International, Washington, DC, USA.
Charlotte Maxwell-JonesIndependent consultant, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Eva NobleWomen for Women International, Washington, DC, USA.
Rachel JewkesGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We assessed whether the Women for Women International (WfWI) economic and social empowerment programme could reduce women's experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) and depression in Afghanistan. Methods: We conducted a two-arm individually randomised controlled trial in six urban and peri-urban communities. Communities were selected by WfWI for being conflict affected and showing signs of economic vulnerability (eg, little or no education, living in extreme poverty). Individual eligibility were female, aged 18-49, able to consent to participate and one woman per household. At 22 months, three primary outcomes were assessed: past year physical IPV experience; past year severe IPV experience; depressive symptoms. There was no blinding to arms. We conducted an intention-to-treat analysis, controlling for age. We also conducted qualitative interviews at endline, analysed using thematic analysis. Results: 1461 women (n=933 married) were recruited and randomised. Retention at endline was n=1210 (82%). Primary outcomes were in the hypothesised direction, but showed no significant impacts: physical IPV (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.88 (0.62 to 1.23)), severe IPV (aOR 0.75 (0.50 to 1.11)) and depressive symptoms (β -0.35 (-1.19 to 0.48)). Women reported reduced food insecurity (β -0.48 (-0.85 to -0.12)), higher earnings (β 3.79 (0.96 to 6.61)) and savings (β 11.79 (9.95 to 13.64)). Women reported less gender-inequitable attitudes (β -0.89 (-1.15 to -0.62)), more household decision-making (β 0.35 (-0.04 to 0.74)) and increased mobility (aOR 1.78 (1.27 to 2.50)). Twenty-eight in-depth interviews were conducted. Conclusion: The intervention did not impact IPV or depression. The intervention did improve livelihoods, create more gender-equitable relationships and increase women's mobility. Translating these gains into IPV and depression reduction is critical. Trial registration number: NCT03236948, registered 2 August 2017.

Indexed as

DepressionEmpowermentGender IdentityIntimate Partner ViolenceAdolescentAdultAfghanistanFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultAfghanistanmixed-methodstrialviolence against womenwomen

Identifiers

PMID32201622
PMCPMC7076232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.