Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32201575›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2020

Recent advances in understanding chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Richard Gordon-Williams, Paul Farquhar-Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Applications of Cannabinoids in Neuropathic Pain: An Updated Review.Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Treatment and diagnosis of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: An update.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard Gordon-WilliamsDepartment of Pain Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1742-3619
Paul Farquhar-SmithDepartment of Pain Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common cause of pain and poor quality of life for those undergoing treatment for cancer and those surviving cancer. Many advances have been made in the pre-clinical science; despite this, these findings have not been translated into novel preventative measures and treatments for CIPN. This review aims to give an update on the pre-clinical science, preventative measures, assessment and treatment of CIPN.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsPaclitaxelPainPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesQuality of LifeAntineoplastic AgentsPaclitaxelChemotherapyNeuropathyPainSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID32201575
PMCPMC7076330
OpenAlexW3011504162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.