Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32201574›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2020

Recent advances in understanding and managing resistant/refractory hypertension.

Michael Doumas, Konstantinos P Imprialos, Manolis S Kallistratos, Athanasios J Manolis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Hypertension: A Continuing Public Healthcare Issue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Device's design and clinical perspectives for resistant hypertension therapy.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Device-Based Therapy for Resistant Hypertension: An Up-to-Date Review.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael Doumas2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Makedonia, 54250, Greece.
Konstantinos P Imprialos2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Makedonia, 54250, Greece.
Manolis S KallistratosCardiology, Asklepeion General Hospital, Athens, Attiki, 16673, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8256-4218
Athanasios J ManolisCardiology, Asklepeion General Hospital, Athens, Attiki, 16673, Greece.
Hippocration General Hospital · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of resistant hypertension presents several challenges in everyday clinical practice. During the past few years, several studies have been performed to identify efficient and safe pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for the management of such patients. The Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2) trial demonstrated significant benefits with the use of spinorolactone as a fourth-line drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension over doxazosin and bisoprolol. In addition, recent data support that spironolactone may demonstrate superiority over central acting drugs in such patients, as well. Based on the European guidelines, spironolactone is recommended as the fourth-line drug option, followed by amiloride, other diuretics, doxazosin, bisoprolol or clonidine.  Among several device-based approaches, renal sympathetic denervation had fallen into hibernation after the disappointing results of the Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN) 3 trial. However, the technique re-emerged at the epicenter of the clinical and research interest after the favorable results of three sham-controlled studies, which facilitated novel catheters and techniques to perform the denervation. Significant results of iliac anastomosis on blood pressure levels have also been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the technique-related adverse events resulted in withdrawal of this interventional approach. Last, the sympatholytic properties of the carotid baroreceptor activation therapy were associated with significant blood pressure reductions in patients with resistant hypertension, which need to be verified in larger controlled trials. Currently device-based approaches are recommended only in the setting of clinical trials until more safety and efficacy data become available.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBisoprololCathetersClinical Trials as TopicClonidineDenervationDoxazosinHumansHypertensionKidneySpironolactoneAntihypertensive AgentsBisoprololClonidineDoxazosinSpironolactonebisoprololcarotid baroreceptor activation therapyclonidinedoxazosiniliac anastomosisrenal sympathetic denervationresistant hypertensionspironolactone

Identifiers

PMID32201574
PMCPMC7065661
OpenAlexW3009682346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.