ArticleThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2020
Factors Preventing Prolonged Closed-Suction Drain Placement after Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Tissue Expanders.
Article in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drain Removal Time in Pre-pectoral versus Dual Plane Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction following Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- Comparison of 30-day Clinical Outcomes with SimpliDerm and AlloDerm RTU in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProlonged drain placement occasionally causes complications such as infection in patients who have undergone implant-based breast reconstruction; therefore, the drainage period must be shortened to avoid complications. PURPOSE: To identify the factors that prevent prolonged drain placement in patients who have undergone immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders.
methodsThis was a retrospective medical chart review of all patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders at a single center from April 2013 to March 2016. Closed-suction drains were placed in and on the implant pocket. An extra drain was positioned in the axilla in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection. The drains were removed at a drainage volume of ≤50 ml per 24 hours. Prolonged drain placement was defined as a period greater than the 75th percentile among all patients. Nine potential risk factors associated with prolonged drain placement were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis.
resultsIn total, 89 tissue expanders in 89 patients were placed in this study. Prolonged drain placement, determined as ≥9 days (range, 5-14 days), was significantly associated with body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, tissue expander size ≥500 ml, and intraoperative bleeding ≥100 ml, in the multivariate analysis. Axillary lymph node dissection with extra-axillary drainage did not prolong the drainage period.
conclusionsOur findings suggested that placing an extra-axillary closed-suction drain following axillary dissection, and reducing intraoperative bleeding and surgical trauma, could prevent prolonged drain placement in immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32201428PMC7447094W3012770110What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.