Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32201388›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2020

Sport and exercise genomics: the FIMS 2019 consensus statement update.

Kumpei Tanisawa, Guan Wang, Jane Seto, Ioanna Verdouka, Richard Twycross-Lewis, Antonia Karanikolou, Masashi Tanaka, Mats Borjesson, Luigi Di Luigi, Michiko Dohi and 10 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. TheSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Association of theBiology of sport · 2025
    Article
  10. Omics Sciences in Regular Physical Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Olympic AI agenda: we need collaboration to achieve evolution.British journal of sports medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kumpei TanisawaFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Guan WangCollaborating Centre of Sports Medicine, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
Jane SetoMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ioanna VerdoukaCollaborating Centre of Sports Medicine, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
Richard Twycross-LewisSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Antonia KaranikolouCollaborating Centre of Sports Medicine, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
Masashi TanakaDepartment for Health and Longevity Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Tokyo, Japan.
Mats BorjessonDepartment of Neuroscience and Physiology, Center for Health and Performance, Goteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Luigi Di LuigiUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Michiko DohiSport Medical Center, Japan Institute of Sports Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1126-7849
Bernd WolfarthDepartment of Sport Medicine, Humboldt University and Charité University School of Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Jeroen SwartUCT Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa.
James Lee John BilzonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6701-7603
Victoriya BadtievaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Theodora PapadopoulouDefence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Stanford Hall, Loughborough, UK.
Maurizio CasascoItalian Federation of Sports Medicine (FMSI), Rome, Italy.
Michael GeistlingerUnit of International Law, Department of Constitutional, International and European Law, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Norbert BachlInstitute of Sports Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Fabio PigozziSport Medicine Unit, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Yannis PitsiladisCollaborating Centre of Sports Medicine, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK Y.Pitsiladis@Brighton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-2449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advances in technologies in the field of genomics such as high throughput DNA sequencing, big data processing by machine learning algorithms and gene-editing techniques are expected to make precision medicine and gene-therapy a greater reality. However, this development will raise many important new issues, including ethical, moral, social and privacy issues. The field of exercise genomics has also advanced by incorporating these innovative technologies. There is therefore an urgent need for guiding references for sport and exercise genomics to allow the necessary advancements in this field of sport and exercise medicine, while protecting athletes from any invasion of privacy and misuse of their genomic information. Here, we update a previous consensus and develop a guiding reference for sport and exercise genomics based on a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis. This SWOT analysis and the developed guiding reference highlight the need for scientists/clinicians to be well-versed in ethics and data protection policy to advance sport and exercise genomics without compromising the privacy of athletes and the efforts of international sports federations. Conducting research based on the present guiding reference will mitigate to a great extent the risks brought about by inappropriate use of genomic information and allow further development of sport and exercise genomics in accordance with best ethical standards and international data protection principles and policies. This guiding reference should regularly be updated on the basis of new information emerging from the area of sport and exercise medicine as well as from the developments and challenges in genomics of health and disease in general in order to best protect the athletes, patients and all other relevant stakeholders.

Indexed as

ExerciseGenetic PrivacyGenomicsSportsHealth PolicyHumansgenesgeneticsgenetic testing

Identifiers

PMID32201388
PMCPMC7418627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.