ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020
Understanding the evolution of interspecies interactions in microbial communities.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel selection in multitype populations.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Limits to the evolution of metabolic dependency in spatially structured microbial communities.iScience · 2026Article
- Selection for Molecularly Complementary Modules (MCMs) Drives the Origins and Evolution of Pleiofunctional, Epistatic Interactomes (PEIs).Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Competition between resident rhizosphere bacteria enhances phytopathogen suppression via emergent antagonism.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Spatial structure: shaping the ecology and evolution of microbial communities.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Community Dynamics Drive Calcium Carbonate Production in an Enriched Consortium of Soil Microbes.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Vertically stratified microbial diversity and keystone species driving element cycling in the Magellan seamount sediments.Microbial genomics · 2025Article
- Phase separation and coexistence in spatial coordination games between microbes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mutualism provides a basis for biodiversity in eco-evolutionary community assembly.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Strengthen or Weaken: Evolutionary Directions of Cross-Feeding After Formation.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Review
- Eco-evolutionary dynamics between multiple competitors reduce phytoplankton coexistence but have limited impacts on community productivity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Altered precipitation and nighttime warming reshape the vertical distribution of soil microbial communities.mSystems · 2025Article
- Strain identity effects contribute more to Pseudomonas community functioning than strain interactions.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Fungi shape genome evolution of bacteria even in the absence of major growth phenotypes.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Dissolved oxygen and nitrates gradient influence marine microbial complexity and stability in Beibu Gulf.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Antimycobacterial activity of intertidal sediment-derived bacteria from False Bay, South Africa.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- The evolution of reduced facilitation in a four-species bacterial community.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Selenium alters the gene content but not the taxonomic composition of the soil microbiome.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Hypernetwork modeling and topology of high-order interactions for complex systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Methods for studying microbial acid stress responses: from molecules to populations.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial communities are complex multi-species assemblages that are characterized by a multitude of interspecies interactions, which can range from mutualism to competition. The overall sign and strength of interspecies interactions have important consequences for emergent community-level properties such as productivity and stability. It is not well understood how interspecies interactions change over evolutionary timescales. Here, we review the empirical evidence that evolution is an important driver of microbial community properties and dynamics on timescales that have traditionally been regarded as purely ecological. Next, we briefly discuss different modelling approaches to study evolution of communities, emphasizing the similarities and differences between evolutionary and ecological perspectives. We then propose a simple conceptual model for the evolution of interspecies interactions in communities. Specifically, we propose that to understand the evolution of interspecies interactions, it is important to distinguish between direct and indirect fitness effects of a mutation. We predict that in well-mixed environments, traits will be selected exclusively for their direct fitness effects, while in spatially structured environments, traits may also be selected for their indirect fitness effects. Selection of indirectly beneficial traits should result in an increase in interaction strength over time, while selection of directly beneficial traits should not have such a systematic effect. We tested our intuitions using a simple quantitative model and found support for our hypotheses. The next step will be to test these hypotheses experimentally and provide input for a more refined version of the model in turn, thus closing the scientific cycle of models and experiments. This article is part of the theme issue 'Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.