Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32200506›Full record

Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2020

Comparison of two intense pulsed light patterns for treating patients with meibomian gland dysfunction.

Yue Wu, Junhua Li, Man Hu, Yinying Zhao, Xiaolei Lin, Yiqin Chen, Lu Li, Yun-E Zhao

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02481167 (Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Chinese Old Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02481167 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Chinese Old Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorWenzhou Medical UniversityRan2015 to 2018Enrolled100ConditionsDry Eye
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yue WuSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.
Junhua LiSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.
Man HuSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.
Yinying ZhaoSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaolei LinSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.
Yiqin ChenSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.
Lu LiSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China.
Yun-E ZhaoSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China. zyehzeye@126.com.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNAffiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

Public Welfare Project of Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau Y20160447Public Welfare Project of Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau Y20160454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this was to determine the efficacy of different patterns of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). MATERIALS AND

methodIPL treatment was administered in 124 eyes of 62 patients with MGD-associated dry eye disease (DED). These patients were divided randomly into two groups treated with different IPL patterns. The first group was treated with "Optimal Pulse Technology" (OPT) (n = 29) and received three consecutive treatments (10-14 J/cm

resultsCompared to baseline, the clinical symptoms and signs in both groups were significantly improved at one and three months after IPL treatment. However, compared to the IRPL group, the OPT-treated group showed significant improvement in the clarity of MG secretions (P = 0.001), the number of MGs yielding clear or cloudy liquid secretions (P < 0.001), the total MG secretion score (P < 0.001) in lower eyelid, the lid margin score in upper (P < 0.001) and lower eyelids (P = 0.013), the first NIKBUT (P = 0.009), and FTBUT (P = 0.006).

conclusionsThese results suggest that IPL has significant clinical value in treating patients with MGD. OPT IPL treatment was more effective in improving MG function in lower eyelids and partial tear film signs than IRPL IPL treatment.

trial registrationThe study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, and the clinical trial accession number is NCT02481167.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesEyelid DiseasesMeibomian Gland DysfunctionPhototherapyHumansMeibomian GlandsTearsDry eye diseaseIntense pulsed lightMeibomian gland dysfunctionMeibomian gland expressionOcular surface

Identifiers

PMID32200506
OpenAlexW3010684284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.