Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32200460›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2020

Proton therapy re-irradiation preserves health-related quality of life in large recurrent glioblastoma.

Daniele Scartoni, Dante Amelio, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Irene Giacomelli, Maurizio Amichetti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Reirradiation - still navigating uncharted waters?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of carbon ion and photon reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniele ScartoniProton Therapy Center-Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, via al Desert 14, 38123, Trento, Italy. daniele.scartoni@apss.tn.it.
Dante AmelioProton Therapy Center-Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, via al Desert 14, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Pierpaolo PalumboDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Irene GiacomelliProton Therapy Center-Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, via al Desert 14, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Maurizio AmichettiProton Therapy Center-Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, via al Desert 14, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Laboratori Guglielmo Marconi (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProton therapy could minimize the risk of side effects and, therefore, reduce the possible detrimental effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of re-irradiation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of re-irradiation with active scanning proton therapy on recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) in terms of HRQOL scored by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Cancer Module (QLQ-BN20).

methodsThirty-three patients with recurrent GBM were re-irradiated with active scanning proton therapy. Subscales within the EORTC QLQ-C30 include five functional scales, six single-item scales, and global QoL. The BN20 assessed visual disorders, motor function, communication deficit, various disease symptoms, treatment, toxicity, and future uncertainty. The patients completed the questionnaires before starting proton therapy, the last day of proton therapy, and at every follow-up visit until progression of disease.

resultsThe treatment was associated with improvement or stability in most of the preselected HRQOL domains. Global health improved over time with a maximum difference of six points between baseline and 3-months follow-up. Social functioning and motor dysfunction improved over time with a maximum difference of eight and two points, respectively. We showed a non-significant decrease in cognitive and emotional functioning. Fatigue remained stable during the analysis such as the other preselected domains.

conclusionsRe-irradiation with proton therapy is a safe and effective treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Proton therapy does not negatively effect on HRQOL, but rather it seems to preserve HRQOL until the time of disease progression.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyQuality of LifeAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProton therapyQuality of lifeRecurrence glioblastomaRe-irradiation

Identifiers

PMID32200460
PMCPMC11804589
OpenAlexW3011631334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.