ArticlePediatric surgery international2020
Hepatic expression of HGF/C-met and native liver survival in biliary atresia.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis of biliary atresia (BA) remains difficult to predict. This study evaluated the roles of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its receptor (C-met) towards clinical outcome and native liver survival.
methodsHepatic HGF and C-met expression were determined using immunohistochemistry from liver biopsies of 41 BA patients during Kasai operation, and 17 non-cholestatic patients. The HGF and C-met expression was visually scored as per its intensity and percentage of stained area. BA patients were classified as high- and low-HGF and C-met receptor status. Native liver survival was compared between the two groups at 3-year follow-up. Data are shown as median and range. MAIN
resultsMedian age of BA patients was 2 (1-6) months. Hepatic HGF and C-met staining scores of BA patients were higher than those of non-cholestatic patients (P < 0.0001). There was a correlation between HGF and C-met staining scores (spearman r = 0.77, P < 0.0001). However, there was no association between their expression and early outcome at 6 months post-op. Mean follow-up time was 68.6 months. Survival analysis revealed that native liver survival at 1 year and 3 years were 88% and 77%, respectively. Additionally, 82.6% (19/23) of patients in the low-HGF group survived with native liver, compared with 66.7% (10/15) of those in high-HGF group (P = 0.436). For C-met expression, 78.6% (22/28) of low-score and 70% (7/10) of high score groups survived with native liver (P = 0.673).
conclusionsStrong expression of hepatic HGF and its receptor in BA patients was demonstrated. However, the expression was not associated with the early outcome and native liver survival. These results suggest that HGF involved in the liver pathology of BA but its expression cannot be used as a prognostic indicator. Small sample size of patients was a main limitation. Further studies are warranted to validate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.