Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32200271›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2020

Characterization of Cationic Bolaamphiphile Vesicles for siRNA Delivery into Tumors and Brain.

Taejin Kim, Mathias Viard, Kirill A Afonin, Kshitij Gupta, Mary Popov, Jacqueline Salotti, Peter F Johnson, Charles Linder, Eliahu Heldman, Bruce A Shapiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Exosome mediated delivery of functional nucleic acid nanoparticles (NANPs).Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Taejin KimRNA Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Mathias ViardBasic Science Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Kirill A AfoninNanoscale Science Program, Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; The Center for Biomedical Engineering and Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Kshitij GuptaRNA Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Mary PopovBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Jacqueline SalottiMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Peter F JohnsonMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Charles LinderBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Eliahu HeldmanBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Bruce A ShapiroRNA Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. Electronic address: shapirbr@mail.nih.gov.
National Cancer Institute · USBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

Role of CEBP transcription factors in regulating cell growth and tumorigenesisZIABC010328 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI JOHNSON, PETER F · 2009 to 2021
$17.5M
Computational RNA NanodesignZIABC011061 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SHAPIRO, BRUCE · 2009 to 2021
$12.3M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are potential therapeutic substances due to their gene silencing capability as exemplified by the recent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the first siRNA therapeutic agent (patisiran). However, the delivery of naked siRNAs is challenging because of their short plasma half-lives and poor cell penetrability. In this study, we used vesicles made from bolaamphiphiles (bolas), GLH-19 and GLH-20, to investigate their ability to protect siRNA from degradation by nucleases while delivering it to target cells, including cells in the brain. Based on computational and experimental studies, we found that GLH-19 vesicles have better delivery characteristics than do GLH-20 vesicles in terms of stability, binding affinity, protection against nucleases, and transfection efficiency, while GLH-20 vesicles contribute to efficient release of the delivered siRNAs, which become available for silencing. Our studies with vesicles made from a mixture of the two bolas (GLH-19 and GLH-20) show that they were able to deliver siRNAs into cultured cancer cells, into a flank tumor and into the brain. The vesicles penetrate cell membranes and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by endocytosis and transcytosis, respectively, mainly through the caveolae-dependent pathway. These results suggest that GLH-19 strengthens vesicle stability, provides protection against nucleases, and enhances transfection efficiency, while GLH-20 makes the siRNA available for gene silencing.

Indexed as

Blood Brain Barrier (BBB)BolaamphiphilesDelivery SystemsGene SilencingMolecular DynamicsRNA NanotechnologysiRNATargetingTransfectionVesicles

Identifiers

PMID32200271
PMCPMC7090283
OpenAlexW3010158348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.