Observational studyBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2020
Dual HER2 blockade in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer - A retrospective population-based observational study in Danish patients.
Observational study in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive advances in HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer: unveiling molecular mechanisms and exploring cutting-edge targeted therapies for enhanced patient outcomes.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of Pertuzumab in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: A pan-Canadian population-based cohort study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Real-world Outcomes of Dual HER2 Blockade Therapy in Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: from Induction to Maintenance.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2024Article
- Capecitabine monotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced HER2-normal breast cancer - a nationwide, retrospective study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
- Real-World First-Line Use of Pertuzumab With Different Taxanes for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Comparative Effectiveness Study Using US Electronic Health Records.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Pertuzumab With Trastuzumab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2022Article
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy for Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- First-Line Treatment of HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer With Dual Blockade Including Biosimilar Trastuzumab (SB3): Population-Based Real-World Data From the DBCG.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2022Article
- Taxane versus vinorelbine in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab for first-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a retrospective two-center study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRandomized clinical trials do not include a population that truly reflects a real-world population, due to their inclusion and exclusion criteria. This leads to concerns about the applicability of these studies in a clinical practice. In the present study, we aim to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in a population of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received pertuzumab and trastuzumab as first-line treatment in a real-world setting.
methodsThe database of the Danish Breast Cancer Group was used to assemble data on patients included in the period April 2013 to August 2017. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
resultsA cohort of 291 patients with a median age of 58 years was registered. Hereof 112 (38%) patients with de novo disease (primary disseminated) and 179 (62%) with recurrence. The median follow-up for OS was 24.1 months. The median OS was 41.8 months (95% CI, 37.7 to NE) and the median PFS was 15.8 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 19.9). For de novo patients alone, the median OS was not reached whereas the median PFS was 17.9 months (95% CI, 14.3 to 27.3). Hazard ratios for patients receiving vinorelbine showed comparable results as for the whole population.
conclusionThis heterogeneous patient population in a real-world setting had a PFS comparable with what could be expected from the related randomized trial. The de novo patients had better OS and PFS as compared to patients with recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.