Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32200132›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2020

Shaping humoral immunity to vaccines through antigen-displaying nanoparticles.

Darrell J Irvine, Benjamin J Read

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Improving the immunogenicity ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Condensate nanovaccine adjuvants augment CD8Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darrell J IrvineKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Development, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA. Electronic address: djirvine@mit.edu.
Benjamin J ReadKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; HST, Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · US

Funding

Identification of neutralizing epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike for design of vaccines and small-molecule antiviralsUM1AI144462 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BURTON, DENNIS R. · 2019 to 2025
$201.6M
Virology and ImmunologyP01AI048240 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RUPRECHT, RUTH MARGRIT · 2000 to 2020
$46.7M
Targeting Immunogenicity to the MPER Hinge and C-helix for BNAb ElicitationP01AI126901 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI REINHERZ, ELLIS L · 2016 to 2020
$9.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS P01 AI048240NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI126901NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI144462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies to qualitatively and quantitatively enhance the humoral response to immunizations with protein and polysaccharide antigens are of broad interest for development of new and more effective vaccines. A strategy of increasing importance is the formulation of antigens into a particulate format, mimicking the physical form of viruses. The potential benefits of enhanced B cell receptor engagement by nanoparticles have been long been appreciated, but recent studies are defining additional important factors governing how nanoparticle immunogens interact with the immune system in the context of lymphoid organs. This review will discuss findings about how nanoparticles enhance humoral immunity in vivo and factors governing the fate of nanoparticle immunogens in lymph nodes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensHumansImmunity, HumoralNanoparticlesVaccinesAntigensVaccines

Identifiers

PMID32200132
PMCPMC7501207
OpenAlexW3012239334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.