Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32199944›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2020

Differentiation and characterization of neurons derived from rat iPSCs.

Monica B Setien, Kylie R Smith, Kaleb Howard, Kathleen Williams, Steve T Suhr, Erin K Purcell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vesicular Glutamate Release from Feeder-FreehiPSC-Derived Neurons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monica B SetienDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Kylie R SmithDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Kaleb HowardNeuroscience Program, Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Kathleen WilliamsDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Steve T SuhrBiomilab, LCC, Lansing, MI, USA.
Erin K PurcellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Neuroscience Program, Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Electronic address: epurcell@egr.msu.edu.
Michigan State University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Optical control of network formation in stem cell-derived neuronsR03NS095202 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PURCELL, ERIN K · 2015 to 2016
$154k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS095202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInduced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) may be an advantageous source of neuronal cells to repair damage due to neurological disorders or trauma. Additionally, they are promising candidates to develop models to study underlying mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases. While successful neural differentiation of iPSCs has been reported in mice, protocols detailing the generation of neural cells from rat iPSCs are relatively limited, and their optimization by manipulating cell culture methods has remained unexplored. NEW

methodHere, we describe and compare the effects of four distinct, commonly used substrates on the neuronal differentiation of rat iPSC (riPSC) derived-neural progenitor cells. Our approach is to use substrate coating as a method to enrich differentiated riPSCs for neuronal subtypes with the desired morphology and maturity. We use a combination of electrophysiology, immunofluorescence staining, and Sholl analysis to characterize the cells generated on each substrate over a nine-day time course.

resultsThe surface coating presented by the cell culture substrate influences the polarity and arborization of differentiating neurons. Polyornithine-laminin coating promoted neuronal arborization and maturation, while Geltrex favored bipolar cells which displayed indicators of functional immaturity. Poly-d-lysine substrate was associated with limited neurite outgrowth and arborization. Gelatin was the least favorable substrate for the growth and differentiation of our cells. Comparison with Existing Method: Rat-derived neural progenitor cells have been previously derived; however, our methods to use substrate coatings to influence morphological and electrical maturity have not been explored previously.

conclusionSubstrate coatings can be selected to enrich differentiated riPSCs for distinctive neuronal morphologies.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesMiceNeuronsRatsCell culture substratesElectrophysiologyInduced pluripotent stem cellsNeural substrateRat neural progenitor cells

Identifiers

PMID32199944
PMCPMC8883348
OpenAlexW3010764945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.