ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2020
Interpatient Similarities in Cardiac Function: A Platform for Personalized Cardiovascular Medicine.
Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Echocardiographic Assessment of Diastolic Function With the ASE Guidelines.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Ultrasonic Texture Analysis for Predicting Acute Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Topological Data Analysis in the Assessment of Coronary Atherosclerosis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Review
- Machine-learning phenotyping of patients with functional mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: the MITRA-AI study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Cardiology: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Topological data analysis to identify cardiac resynchronization therapy patients exhibiting benefit from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Cardiac ultrasomics for acute myocardial infarction risk stratification and prediction of all-cause mortality: a feasibility study.Echo research and practice · 2024Article
- Broadening Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography.Cardiology and therapy · 2024Review
- A Patient Similarity Network (CHDmap) to Predict Outcomes After Congenital Heart Surgery: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Topological Data Analysis in Cardiovascular Signals: An Overview.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Phenogrouping and risk stratification of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade using topological data analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Topological Data Analysis Identified Prognostically-Distinct Phenotypes in Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Patients.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Echocardiography for Systolic Function Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Automated algorithms in diastology: how to move forward?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in the pediatric echocardiography laboratory: Automation, physiology, and outcomes.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Review
- Electrocardiogram-Based Machine Learning Emulator Model for Predicting Novel Echocardiography-Derived Phenogroups for Cardiac Risk-Stratification: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022Article
- A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Endotyping in Heart Failure - Identifying Mechanistically Meaningful Subtypes of Disease.Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2021Review
- Machine Learning Augmented Echocardiography for Diastolic Function Assessment.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe authors applied unsupervised machine-learning techniques for integrating echocardiographic features of left ventricular (LV) structure and function into a patient similarity network that predicted major adverse cardiac event(s) (MACE) in an individual patient.
backgroundPatient similarity analysis is an evolving paradigm for precision medicine in which patients are clustered or classified based on their similarities in several clinical features.
methodsA retrospective cohort of 866 patients was used to develop a network architecture using 9 echocardiographic features of LV structure and function. The data for 468 patients from 2 prospective cohort registries were then added to test the model's generalizability.
resultsThe map of cross-sectional data in the retrospective cohort resulted in a looped patient network that persisted even after the addition of data from the prospective cohort registries. After subdividing the loop into 4 regions, patients in each region showed unique differences in LV function, with Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrating significant differences in MACE-related rehospitalization and death (both p < 0.001). Addition of network information to clinical risk predictors resulted in significant improvements in net reclassification, integrated discrimination, and median risk scores for predicting MACE (p < 0.05 for all). Furthermore, the network predicted the cardiac disease cycle in each of the 96 patients who had second echocardiographic evaluations. An improvement or remaining in low-risk regions was associated with lower MACE-related rehospitalization rates than worsening or remaining in high-risk regions (3% vs. 37%; p < 0.001).
conclusionsPatient similarity analysis integrates multiple features of cardiac function to develop a phenotypic network in which patients can be mapped to specific locations associated with specific disease stage and clinical outcomes. The use of patient similarity analysis may have relevance for automated staging of cardiac disease severity, personalized prediction of prognosis, and monitoring progression or response to therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.