Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32199835›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2020

Interpatient Similarities in Cardiac Function: A Platform for Personalized Cardiovascular Medicine.

Márton Tokodi, Sirish Shrestha, Christopher Bianco, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Grace Casaclang-Verzosa, Jagat Narula, Partho P Sengupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Automated algorithms in diastology: how to move forward?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Endotyping in Heart Failure - Identifying Mechanistically Meaningful Subtypes of Disease.Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Márton TokodiDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia; Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Sirish ShresthaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Christopher BiancoDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Nobuyuki KagiyamaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Grace Casaclang-VerzosaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Jagat NarulaDivision of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Partho P SenguptaDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia. Electronic address: partho.sengupta@wvumedicine.org.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe authors applied unsupervised machine-learning techniques for integrating echocardiographic features of left ventricular (LV) structure and function into a patient similarity network that predicted major adverse cardiac event(s) (MACE) in an individual patient.

backgroundPatient similarity analysis is an evolving paradigm for precision medicine in which patients are clustered or classified based on their similarities in several clinical features.

methodsA retrospective cohort of 866 patients was used to develop a network architecture using 9 echocardiographic features of LV structure and function. The data for 468 patients from 2 prospective cohort registries were then added to test the model's generalizability.

resultsThe map of cross-sectional data in the retrospective cohort resulted in a looped patient network that persisted even after the addition of data from the prospective cohort registries. After subdividing the loop into 4 regions, patients in each region showed unique differences in LV function, with Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrating significant differences in MACE-related rehospitalization and death (both p < 0.001). Addition of network information to clinical risk predictors resulted in significant improvements in net reclassification, integrated discrimination, and median risk scores for predicting MACE (p < 0.05 for all). Furthermore, the network predicted the cardiac disease cycle in each of the 96 patients who had second echocardiographic evaluations. An improvement or remaining in low-risk regions was associated with lower MACE-related rehospitalization rates than worsening or remaining in high-risk regions (3% vs. 37%; p < 0.001).

conclusionsPatient similarity analysis integrates multiple features of cardiac function to develop a phenotypic network in which patients can be mapped to specific locations associated with specific disease stage and clinical outcomes. The use of patient similarity analysis may have relevance for automated staging of cardiac disease severity, personalized prediction of prognosis, and monitoring progression or response to therapies.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedUnsupervised Machine LearningVentricular Function, LeftAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPattern Recognition, AutomatedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisechocardiographypatient similaritytopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID32199835
PMCPMC7556337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.