Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32198658›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2020

The antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of a copper-loaded zinc oxide phosphate cement.

Torsten Wassmann, Andrea Schubert, Felix Malinski, Martin Rosentritt, Sebastian Krohn, Kirsten Techmer, Ralf Bürgers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Application of Copper Nanoparticles in Dentistry.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Torsten Wassmann *Department of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany. torsten.wassmann@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Andrea Schubert *Department of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Felix MalinskiDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Martin RosentrittDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
Sebastian KrohnDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Kirsten TechmerDepartment of Crystallography, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Ralf BürgersDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvidence about modifications of dental luting materials to minimize biological failure at the "marginal gap" between teeth and fixed prosthodontics is scarce. We compared a copper-modified (Co-ZOP) and a conventional zinc oxide phosphate cement (ZOP) in terms of antimicrobial and cytotoxic potentials in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND

methodsSpecimens of ZOP and Co-ZOP were characterized by the mean arithmetic roughness (Ra) and surface free energy (SFE). Powder components were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) showed elemental material compositions. In vitro microbial adhesion was shown using SEM, luminescence, and fluorescence assays. CCK-8 assays of mouse fibroblasts (L929) and human gingival fibroblasts (GF-1) were performed after 6, 24, and 48 h of specimen incubation. In vivo, ZOP and Co-ZOP specimens were applied intraorally for 12 h; biofilm accumulation was shown using SEM.

resultsRa of ZOP and Co-ZOP showed no significant differences; SFE was significantly higher for Co-ZOP. EDX exhibited minor copper radiation for Co-ZOP, none for ZOP. In vitro fungal adhesion to Co-ZOP was significantly higher than to ZOP; in vitro streptococcal adhesion, cytotoxicity, and in vivo biofilm formation were not significantly different.

conclusionsCo-ZOP showed low surface allocations of copper with no improved antimicrobial properties compared with conventional ZOP in vitro or in vivo. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Antimicrobial effects and low cytotoxicity of biomaterials are important for the clinical outcome. Based on our in vitro and in vivo results, no clinical recommendation can be given for the tested Co-ZOP.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsZinc OxideCopperDental CementsMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOxidesPhosphatesSurface PropertiesZinc Phosphate CementAnti-Infective AgentsCopperDental CementsOxidesPhosphatesZinc OxideZinc Phosphate CementBiofilmCandida albicansCopperCytotoxicityDental luting materialStreptococcus sanguinisZinc oxide phosphate cement

Identifiers

PMID32198658
PMCPMC7544705
OpenAlexW3012126913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.